Archive for November, 2008

No Longer America’s Most Republican County?

No Longer America’s Most Republican County?
Written November 13, 2008

I checked once, twice, a third time. Senator John McCain carried Orange County, California by less than 4 percent over Senator Barack Obama. At last count, 549,276 votes for McCain; 509,725 for Obama, on the home turf of famous Republican political groups like the Lincoln Club and New Majority.

It is the best performance by a Democrat in Orange County in 72 years. Not the result you would expect from what local GOP leaders have branded as “America’s Most Republican County.”

Twenty-one states provided the Arizona Senator with a greater margin of victory.

Some argue the thin margin of McCain’s O.C. victory is an aberration. President George Bush’s sustained unpopularity, economic distress, financial crisis and the selection of lightweight and stridently social conservative Sarah Palin helped fuel the once-in-a-generation uprising.

True, the Obama tidal wave did not translate into any O.C. congressional Republican seats turning over despite strong candidates, such as Hunting Beach Mayor Debbie Cook challenging long-time incumbent Rep. Dana Rohrabacher. We can largely thank gerrymandered congressional districts, which virtually guarantee the election of candidates from the two major political parties, in keeping incumbents unscathed. Tangentially, this is why the passage of Prop. 11 only is a partial victory; it deals directly with state legislative redistricting but not congressional.

The election was fundamentally a referendum on the Bush presidency. This takes away nothing from Barack Obama’s well-deserved historic victory. Barack Obama is a fascinating and compelling candidate. He possesses an eloquence and dexterity McCain lacks. I am hopeful he will be great American president.

Bush’s eight years in the Oval Office crushed the Republican brand. Downstream U.S. House and Senate Republicans scrambled to distance themselves from the disillusionment engendered by the Bush presidency.

We need not be reminded that Bush’s actions as President belied his pledges as candidate. Remember his now-discredited slogan, “compassionate conservative?” What did we get instead? Everything got bigger: government, spending, deficit, debt and depth of deception. What happened to limited government, both domestically and overseas?

Does this mean that the famously “red county” image of O.C. will turn blue in the next election? Not necessarily. However, the demographics continue to change. Voters of all ages understand better that decisions based on a flawed ideology can be reckless and cause significant harm to our country. What standing do neo-conservatives, such as Paul Wolfowitz, have today with rank-and-file Republicans? Many life-long Republicans have a right to feel betrayed.

The other development in Orange County, and across the nation, is that more people are realizing that government decisions really matter and that public policies can help or harm our way of life. The housing and financial crisis, along with declining median home prices, resulted in kitchen-table conversations about the role of government and public policy seldom discussed before. While the economic and housing downturn caused real pain to many, it also served as an enlightening on the role of government and how its decisions affect our businesses and quality of life.

The technology industry, crucial to our nation’s competitive advantage, is another example where a crisis looms unless government wakes up. The news is still mostly good but signs of trouble are rising. Nearly 1 million technology workers in California earn an average annual wage topping $100,000, more than 60 percent higher than the average annual wage in other industries. In Orange County, the average high-tech wage was $81,900, 68 percent higher than the average private sector wage.

Some argue, based on ideology, that technology innovators and entrepreneurs don’t need government involvement because the market, if truly free, will produce the breakthroughs that will keep America on the leading edge. Although the free market and America’s entrepreneurial culture is still our core advantage, to think that government has no role is naïve. And what is dangerous is that federal and state legislators continue to make harmful policy decisions, like turning away the world’s best and brightest due to short-sighted immigration laws, with little or no input from the overwhelming majority of California-based technology companies.

I moved to Orange County in 2001. The Orange County Business Council rightly and proudly boasts that it is the fifth largest in the nation. Yet political decisions, and ideas for government action, seemed to be generated by a small cadre of individuals on the far right of the political spectrum.

Today, many of these same people blog endlessly, mainly to each other, about how the county and world should work. Their decidedly partisan ideas have grown out of touch with a large swath of voters in the county previously disinterested in the political process.

Grassroots movements (where you actually get more people of all political affiliations involved in the process to help educate and, yes, lobby governments and politicians) really do work. One can be principled without being an ideologue.

Politics is for those who show up. It is also the art of the possible. This election proved that.

Tim Jemal is CEO of Jemal Public Affairs and the Executive Director of the bipartisan Technology Leadership Political Action Committee (TLPAC).

A California Guide to Nov. 4 Elections

For California registered voters, here’s what I suggest. Vote your conscience and above all, vote.

For President – Obama. See my blog: Time for Undecideds to Decide

Yes on Proposition 1A-High Speed Rail Bond Act. High-speed rail between S. & N. California makes sense but is long overdue. We need a 21st century rail system. Let’s hope it’s implemented effectively.

Yes on Proposition 2-Standards for Confining Farm Animals. Prohibiting confinement of animals raised for commercial purposes on California farms and ranches by 2015 seems reasonable.

No on Proposition 3-Children’s Hospital Bond Act. I want to vote yes and thought about offering no recommendation, but that’s a cop out. I can still be persuaded on Prop. 3 by Tuesday. However, I want to know why we are being asked to authorize nearly $1 billion in general obligation bonds for construction at Children’s hospitals when four years ago voters passed an almost identical measure, approving $750 million for similar needs. Only $450 million of that funding has been awarded.

No on Proposition 4-Mandatory Parental Notification by Minors. This is a serious issue not provided justice in this ballot measure. I have a tween girl. I tried to find ways to recommend a Yes vote. Instead of mandating family communications we should provide better education about sexual behavior.

Yes on Proposition 5-Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act. Provides treatment and rehabilitation for non-violent drug offenders. This is overdue and should mitigate prison overcrowding with a sensible policy.

No on Proposition 6-Police Funding and Criminal Penalties. This measure would do very little to reduce gang-related crime.

No on Proposition 7-Renewable Energy Generation. Would likely bring higher electric bills, disrupt renewable energy development and discriminates against small wind and solar companies.

No on Proposition 8-Eliminate Right of Same-sex couples to Marry. The Orange County Register got it right in opposition to this anti civil rights initiative by saying that “guarantees of individual rights are included in constitutions precisely to ensure that such rights cannot be taken away, by majority vote, legislative enactment or administrative decision.” Well said.

No on Proposition 9-Criminal Justice System. Victims’ Rights. Parole. Everyone wants justice and rights for crime victims. This ballot measure, funded by Henry Nicholas III (who somewhat ironically is under now under indictment on conspiracy, fraud and drug charges), appears to be duplicative of existing laws and could impede relieving prison crowding that would cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

No on Proposition 10-Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable Energy Bonds. This $5 billion bond would do very little to reduce the carbon footprint and mitigate detrimental effects of climate change. This is the wrong initiative toward cleaner vehicles. The natural gas interests of T. Boone Pickens, who put up most the $3.75 million to put the initiative on the ballot, would disproportionately benefit over cleaner alternatives such as wind and solar. We need major investments in clean and renewable energy technologies – but Prop. 10 is the wrong approach at this time.

Yes on Proposition 11-State Legislative Redistricting. It’s not perfect but a step forward in making state legislative districts more competitive and representative of the people. See the endorsement of the Technology Leadership Political Action Committee (TLPAC), for which I serve as Executive Director.

Yes on Proposition 12-Veterans’ Bond Act. Veterans deserve strong support from government. For the 27th time since 1922, California voters are being asked to approve a bond issue to help veterans buy homes. This measure was placed on the ballot by a unanimous vote of 75–0 in the State Assembly and 39–0 in the State Senate. The money would replenish funds in the CalVet Home Loan program, which provides mortgages to military veterans at below-market interest rates. I do think Veterans’ benefits and compensation is fundamentally a federal, not state, matter. Nevertheless, Proposition 12 deserves a Yes vote.